Engine re-build frequency.

Started by Hi RX7, October 13, 2008, 08:11:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hi RX7

Just browsing through a number of recent threads I have noticed that the frequency of engine re-builds is quite high. So I was wondering what the average time/mileage is for RX7 owners on this forum. For instance mine went within my first year of ownership and from other threads/postings there seems to be at least another six cars off the road at the moment in need of a re-build so what is the full figure?

karl_tate

IMO i think that there is far too many variables to put a timeline on a engine.
____________________

Built In Japan - Built Better In The UK

XBOX GAMERS TAG --- tatey1985

m1tch

2nd gen = average 100-125k
3rd gen = average 75k

More boost = lower engine life

Rzla

Quote from: m1tch;544557More boost = lower engine life

So true ... the same applies for a piston engine.
Those who think tuning a piston engine doesn\'t make it less reliable are kidding themselves.
Any type of engine you tune is susceptible to engine failure, except the cost of rebuilding a skyling gtr lump is 3 times the cost of a rotary rebuild.
It depends what routes you take to keep the car safe, ie water injection/ignition amps etc.

BenLewisMav

I hope thats 75,000kms..
Of course David you don\'t hear so much about the ones still running fine with no problems, so keep that in mind lol :D

dthebuk

Quote from: BenLewisMav;544584I hope thats 75,000kms..

pretty sure its miles


\'91 FC TII - Drifter... Under construction :D
:burnout

Rzla

Quote from: BenLewisMav;544584I hope thats 75,000kms..
Of course David you don\'t hear so much about the ones still running fine with no problems, so keep that in mind lol :D

Exactly who is going to put up posts about how well their engines are running?
You have to put it all into perspective, people will obviously post when the engine is not running well, to find out what the problem is etc ... but that does not mean more run bad than run well. It is quite the opposite.

m1tch

My FC is at 81k miles with compression ratings of 7 all round :)


Hi RX7

Just to get things into proportion it would be a good idea to find people who have run their cars for long periods without incident/re-build and this thread is in no way knocking the reliability of the rotary its just to really get a picture at this moment in time as to how many are off the road due to major engine failure. From my own point of view I would love to keep the rotary in my RX7 for as long as possible and although my mind is made up regarding the next move engine wise I was just checking to see if say someone was really unlucky and had perhaps had to re-build more than say twice in five years.

BenLewisMav

Quote from: Rzla;544593Exactly who is going to put up posts about how well their engines are running?
You have to put it all into perspective, people will obviously post when the engine is not running well, to find out what the problem is etc ... but that does not mean more run bad than run well. It is quite the opposite.

Yeah that\'s precisely what I was saying (I\'m not sure if you misread it? We kinda said the same thing!)..

BenLewisMav

Quote from: David Wiltshire;544606Just to get things into proportion it would be a good idea to find people who have run their cars for long periods without incident/re-build and this thread is in no way knocking the reliability of the rotary its just to really get a picture at this moment in time as to how many are off the road due to major engine failure. From my own point of view I would love to keep the rotary in my RX7 for as long as possible and although my mind is made up regarding the next move engine wise I was just checking to see if say someone was really unlucky and had perhaps had to re-build more than say twice in five years.

I agree, it would be interesting to know, i think two important things to also record would be;
1) What was the cause? (i.e. Was it actually anything to do with being a rotary? A clogged fuel filter, dodgy plugs, failing Walbro Fuel pump or overboosting doesnt count)
2) Was it standard?

-And I think 50,000-60,000miles is a fairer, more realistic figure for an FD, FC mileage can vary greatly (possibly due to the much more different types of owners that FC\'s attract -sorry for any generalisation!)

SmbFD3S

At 61,000 miles on UK FD and original engine running 1 bar and runs really well (touches wood) :D
 
Am rebuilding it from end of this month however while it is running well and hopefully wont cost as much :)
\'92 UK RX7 FD
\'97 Kwak ZX6R currently at Stage 3
\'86 Honda CRM250R stroker
\'11 BMW 320d ED
 
 

clarky350

Hi I owned a 420bhp single turbo ,nailed it every where for three years , loved it to bits .Never failed me once ,sold it so sad will have to have one again some day.
ps my mate blew his slow cossie up three time in one year, and my other mate spent £3500 in one year fixing his y reg 328 .
Good memory bmw mate crying out for jesus to save him on the way to pub while I nailed rex through the gears great times.
cars owned.
nissan 94 gtr
nissan 200 x2
wrx
rex the best by far

Nik da Greek

My 2p\'s worth would be to agree with what was alluded to above, which is that it might be of more use to enquire why engines have gone pop rather than how often. The best built engine in the world will go off bang pretty quick if its run on low-octane bilge from Sainsburys pumps and modified with filters, de-cat and no re-mapping, but is that a fair assessment of the longevity of the engine?

In actual fact, it was abject cretinism that killed my engine, before I owned the car. The guy I bought it from had run it on standard unleaded (not even Super, let alone Optimax!) and it had a decat exhaust and standard ECU. It used to boost spike like a b@st@rd, and he blew up an apex seal whilst showing off to his mate with his heavy right boot. At that point, the car had done about 80,000 miles on its original engine, and probably didn\'t deserve to meet such a stupid owner!

I\'m sure it would\'ve needed rebuilding by now anyway, but who knows how much longer it\'d have lasted if it hadn\'t been murdered by Moron Boy? For what it\'s worth, the rebuilt engine has outlived the car (which I crashed to death last year) and is still going strong in my current FD something like 30 000 miles later. I don\'t think something as highly strung as a rotary turbo engine has a bad reliability record, tbh, when you appreciate the level of tune they\'re in. Maybe that\'s because I cut my teeth on two-stroke bikes like 250LCs where you needed the reflexes of a striking cobra to get the clutch in at the first sign of "nipping up". One YPVS 350 I had was like riding a hand grenade with the pin out, you knew it was gonna blow, it was just a question of when!

BenLewisMav

Quote from: BenLewisMav;544613I agree, it would be interesting to know, i think two important things to also record would be;
1) What was the cause? (i.e. Was it actually anything to do with being a rotary? A clogged fuel filter, dodgy plugs, failing Walbro Fuel pump or overboosting doesnt count)
2) Was it standard?

3) Was it an original engine?
4) If not, who did the rebuild? (potentially hot water there, but the I\'m sure a reputable engine builder will stand by their work, and any alleviating circumstance would already be explained in question 1.)