MOT Legislation Help needed before I go for an arguement

Started by captainbizzaro, July 22, 2010, 06:18:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

captainbizzaro

Evening chaps,

Rex been MOT\'d today, failed the CO test.....can\'t think why!:bandit:bandit:bandit

Anyway,before he starts faffing with my carb does anyone know where/if the \'rotary exemption\' legislation is available on the interweb?

I assume the pre 1986 rule still applies as mine is an \'83?

Just want some info before I goes in guns blazing.

Ta!

HaywardRotary

It requires a visual test only.
87 on is for emmisions test.
regards
Carl
We warranty our rebuilt engines for Detonation, track day\'s and RWYB and NOW for 30 months which is two and half years or 30,000 miles
We also build all types of race or road engines.
We build race and track cars too.
Any kind of porting undertaken.
Single turbo conversions.
S

captainbizzaro

Cheers Carl-don\'t suppose you have any idea where I might be able to find proof of this on the net so I can show him?

Prof

This should help:
 
http://www.ukmot.com/6-4.asp#Text_top
 
Can\'t seem to find the flowchart it refers to on page 5a ??  But I am guessing this should be enough for your MOT guy to see it in print.
"Plus this engine is probably one of the most volumetric engines going! It passes more air than a herd of cows eating vindaloo\'s" - courtesy of AtomicRex


Speedline Imports

It will be in the MOT testers hand book if he bothers to look in it
 
http://www.ukmot.com/6-4.asp
 
 
Edit, same as above!!!
martin@speedlineimports.co.uk
TEL. 07742 690672
 
Monday-Friday 9am-5pm
Weekends - By appointment only.

Speedline on Facebook

captainbizzaro

Thank you kind sirs that is perfect. Funnily enough I have just had the \'go look in your handbook\' conversation but that wasn\'t recieved very well.:2Confused

Prof

You are well within your rights to challenge an MOT testers decision if you think it unfair, and obviously if he\'s got a habbit of getting things wrong it might mean he needs retraining ;)
 
A friend with a skyline had a similar issue over a screamer pipe - the MOT tester claimed it was an exhaust leak - but at idle it wasn\'t nor ever should be - just the guy didn\'t know his ar$e from his elbow - he\'s not an MOT tester any more...
"Plus this engine is probably one of the most volumetric engines going! It passes more air than a herd of cows eating vindaloo\'s" - courtesy of AtomicRex


captainbizzaro

This is to prevent anyone go through the hassle I\'m going through at the mo

In black and white.

Maybe this link should be a sticky because I can\'t be the only 1st gen owner with this problem.

http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/crt/doitonline/bl/mottestingmanualsandguides/mottestingmanualsandguides.htm

Prof

"Plus this engine is probably one of the most volumetric engines going! It passes more air than a herd of cows eating vindaloo\'s" - courtesy of AtomicRex


FD3S Efini

im sorry to thread hijack but has anyone got anything on imports non cat test, i have a 93 FD decatted which is due next month and i want to have something in my hand to show the MOT dude incase they fail me for doing the wrong emmissions test
 
Cheers
 
Kris

Brett

If its post Aug 92 (K plate or later) then it will be subjected to a CAT test. (Unless someone else knows better)
Brap Brap Brap Brap

FD3S Efini

i always thought it was 95 but i may be completly wrong lol
 
Cheers
 
Kris

FD3S Efini

anymore info will be much appreciatedCheersKris

logicalChimp

Quote from: Brett;706230If its post Aug 92 (K plate or later) then it will be subjected to a CAT test. (Unless someone else knows better)

Hmmm - can\'t point at anything to prove it, but I was pretty sure that the non-cat test was pre \'95 for imports (certainly, my 94 has passed two MoTs without a cat)

turbotoaster

its 92 for a uk car, 95 for any import, the car needs to pass 3.5%co and 1500ppm HC