Probably a stupid question but here goes

[Bobbit]

How come? Admiral dodgy like?

[monsween]

any reason for that, so far ive been fairly happy with them.

Touch wood

[sadgoth]

If you say it is a single turbo they will see it as an FC3S (turbo II) not the FD3S. I would give them the reg and the model RX7 and it should come up as a Turbo II, thing is as it was a 97 car it is more difficult to quote for, UK FDs were only available from 92 to 94/95 so any car after that doesn\'t show up in the normal car lists that insurers use so by saying it is a single turbo they will probably manually put it as an Turbo II! You need to make sure they quote you for a 2.6l engine not a 2.4l if it is a 2.4 you\'ll be mis quoted and you cover won\'t be valid!

Check out the Insuring your rotary section, there is a good list of insurers that member have used there.

[sadgoth]

I don\'t think Admiral are dodgy, but I suspect as a mainstream insurer, they may not have the capability to cover our cars and you\'ll find you get misquoted by them.

[Matt_K]

Yeah, for stock, unmodified cars admiral are great. I\'ve been with them for a few years now.

Trying to insure a import / performance vehicle.. umm, yeah - As sadgoth said, It\'s not that they are dodgy, but their line of business / underwriters just aren\'t set up for such quotes.