Messages

TBH i found the boot lid pretty heavy n thou to myself is this actually carbon!?!? unless am just weak haha….

That is because it has a glass window still.

This is sold.

Price £200

I\'m selling my patch loom for early spec FD looms.  This is unused.

Looking for £300 posted.




Open to offers.

Any update on this?

+1 to this

By the looks of it, he\'s just being a :censored::censored::censored::censored: tease at the moment.:p  Hasn\'t been on since the 6th from his profile.

Just checked, got a decent strip.

I should have a decent section off the front of the FD.  I might have binned it though/ it might be too damaged to be useful.  I\'ll have a check this weekend.

Interested in the front for FD.

eeeerrr, hes not breaking it....

Yet...

I,  personally,  cannot see where the asking price has come from.   Maybe if it hadn\'t been :censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored:ised, but it has and not with enough mods to warrant the asking price.  All on my opinion of course.

GLWS nonetheless.

Are the lens covers there.?

Also,  any idea of who made them?

Ignore this,  I looked at the pictures properly.   As nadz says,  these are not sleek.

Are the lens covers there.?

Also,  any idea of who made them?

Is there anyway to tell this from the Japspeed or any other copy?  Got sold one under the impression that it was Japspeed but the dimensions weren\'t the same as the Japspeed one (it\'s 1700 too while the Japspeed one is meant to be 1760).

Sorry for the thread hijack,  but you seem to have sold it

ive allready tried that, they refused on the basis that the car would have 2 insurance policies on it which is illegal.

as you\'ve said im pretty much relying on one oft he dealers on here having something in.

Is this not a myth?  Surely this is why insurance policies have the "in case of any part of a claim being covered by more than one policy we will only pay our share" (words to that effect at least) part in them.

So the only real way to actually have a crossover is fully comp on both policies and the car being damaged/stolen etc. in which case you will only ever get 50% from each policy (or each policy will only pay out its share for what it covered).  So long as you don\'t try get 100% from both, which obviously would be fraud but that wouldn\'t mean having two policies that cover the same car are illegal, rather fraud is - much like making any false claim.

When I had a quick look, there were a lot of claims arguing both sides of the fence but no actual legislation stating it was.  It may very well be the policy of insurance companies that your insurance will be invalid if you have multiple cover on it or something like that, but when I just skimmed through mine I didn\'t see anything saying that.  But I hasten to add it was a very quick skim and would easily have missed it if it was there.

If someone has some hard evidence I\'d love to know what the law actually says, interested now.

Alternatively ask someone with third party drive any car to test drive it for you, of course the dealership would probably say no unless you left the full amount for the car as a safety deposit.