Mazda Rotary Club

General => General Technical => Anything Engine/Performance/Tuning related => Topic started by: suba on September 08, 2009, 08:55:28 AM

Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on September 08, 2009, 08:55:28 AM
Since fitting of a V-mount the undertray on my FD has not gone back on yet - what do you guys commonly do....run with or without?

Are there any issues regarding running without one?
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: CharlieP on September 08, 2009, 09:37:02 AM
I\'ve heard they are important for air flow out from the engine bay!
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on September 08, 2009, 09:43:22 AM
Well - I was advised by a well know specialist that airflow was improved by running without one.....

Has anyone had any issues with grit or stones flying into belts etc.?
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: CharlieP on September 08, 2009, 10:11:13 AM
Who was that??
 I was only saying what I\'d heard....not being a know all :P
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: BlitzBoy on September 08, 2009, 10:23:52 AM
depends on how you intercooler is setup, on FMIC I ran without one for a while I put back the undertray and got better cooling for the water rad.
On a V mount it may be different
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: SiH on September 08, 2009, 12:56:09 PM
My car runs a shedload cooler with the undertray on.
Also feels a lot mroe stable. That\'s an FRP one though.

I really would put it back on if at all possible, they make a big difference.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: ashc on September 08, 2009, 07:54:04 PM
mine was taken off by reworx when they fitted the vmount, and not put back on as the rad projects lower, they said it wasn\'t necessary anymore - haven\'t had any probs over the last year, although i cr**p myself over speedbumps. With a standard engine, it does make a difference though.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: FlikstRR on September 08, 2009, 08:42:27 PM
ive been drifting for most of the  season on a V mount setup with no undertray...

trust me.. run with one!  temps are ALOT higher without one as the air hs a path with less resistance to run..  I\'d advise the undertray at a minimum if not.. additional ducting if your running a V-mount. :)
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: AshRX on September 08, 2009, 10:33:21 PM
dont run with one and have no intention of running with one. Temps are all good whatever conditions.

As above it all depends on setup of rad and IC
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on September 09, 2009, 12:18:47 AM
hmmm...lots of different opinions.  I may try and rig something up that caters for the lower radiator on the V-mount.

I\'m more concerned with stability at speed, and I can\'t imagine that gravel traps do it much good either.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: SiH on September 09, 2009, 08:02:09 AM
Some intersting stuff for you :
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_2159/article.html
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_2160/article.html
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_2162/article.html

There\'s some stuff of relevance in there :) Worth a read, anyways :)
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: Nik da Greek on September 09, 2009, 09:11:17 AM
That\'s a really fascinating read, excellent links, SiH. Especially interesting the way that his intercooler "scoop" actually worked as a vent, sucking air up off the radiator and blowing it the wrong way through the IC! Then you read the third part, and it\'s obvious that the vent was in the worst possible place for it to act as an intake, the area of lowest air pressure across the bonnet. It shows with startling clarity that the shape and direction the vent faces is almost completely irrelevant compared to the pressure gradient involved.

Those experiments show that vented bonnets like the Mazdaspeed/KnightSports style ones where the vents are right forward between the headlights should work much better than the FEED style ones where the pressure measurements imply that if anything, their vents are more likely to be sucking air back into the engine bay rather than exhausting it out. That\'s exactly what the Yanks discovered forty-odd years ago with things like the cowl induction hoods on Camaros and Pontiacs where they utilised the high-pressure wave at the base of the windscreen to force air back under the rear of the bonnet to feed the carbs.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: SiH on September 09, 2009, 09:34:14 AM
Exunctly :) It\'s the link that I dig out when people post up pictures of their bonnets raised at the back \'drift spec\' because it \'makes it run cooler\' :)

It could also go some way to explain why my AD9 bonnet didn\'t really seem to make much of a difference to cooling at all - I see FAR better temps with my MS undertray and stock bonnet. Goes to chow that you don\'t neccessarily need a vented bonnet with a V mount :)

It\'s a shame I never got round to actually doing a test like that with my old bonent, I just measured intake temps etc.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: redgti on September 09, 2009, 09:41:34 AM
I have been thinking about this and i don\'t see the need for the undertray with  a v-mount. As long as the v-mount is properly boxed in and ducted from the front bumper.
 
If anything would this undertray not keep extra hot air in the engine bay as the rad fans blow air in to the undertray and not directly out of the bay.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: Nik da Greek on September 09, 2009, 09:46:00 AM
Quote from: redgti;640245I have been thinking about this and i don\'t see the need for the undertray with  a v-mount. As long as the v-mount is properly boxed in and ducted from the front bumper.
 
If anything would this undertray not keep extra hot air in the engine bay as the rad fans blow air in to the undertray and not directly out of the bay.

Evidently not.....

I think it\'s down to the undertray keeping a nice, fast, smooth stream of air flowing under the car that a) sucks air out the rear lip of the tray due to moving faster than it and therefore creating a pressure drop at the rear and b) not being all messy and turbulent, thus making it easier for airstreams from the engine bay to merge with the airflow around the car.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: SiH on September 09, 2009, 09:48:31 AM
Quote from: redgti;640245I have been thinking about this and i don\'t see the need for the undertray with  a v-mount. As long as the v-mount is properly boxed in and ducted from the front bumper.
 
If anything would this undertray not keep extra hot air in the engine bay as the rad fans blow air in to the undertray and not directly out of the bay.
Have a read of the links I\'ve posted dude - Undertrays can make a huge difference, and the flow through the bay doesn\'t work the same way as a lot of people think :)
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: redgti on September 09, 2009, 09:53:33 AM
yeah i\'ll give it a read later i think. i wish i\'d done a study like this for my dissetation.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on September 11, 2009, 09:51:09 AM
Well - here\'s what I\'m going to do.  Go for a blast and check the Water / charge temps on the Power FC with the tray on, and then with it off - that should settle this one!
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: SiH on September 11, 2009, 10:25:06 AM
You need to get a lot more enpirical data than that if you want to fet some conclusive results dude. Repeated runs in tne same conditions, with the same exrernal temps etc at the very least.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on September 11, 2009, 11:05:52 AM
I dont agree - same day conditions, run the car from 2,000 rpm to redline in 3rd and see what the temps do.  if the airflow over the V-mount is compromised without the tray then the charge temps should reflect it noticeably - if they dont then I dont see that there is an issue.

I asked a friend of mine about the articles posted earlier in the thread - this was his response:

Aerodynamics is something of an art besides a science.
The pressure gradient across the rad front face to back face would give more indication of air flow through the rad. Also there will be a pressure variation at different places on the face of the rad. So the whole story would not be so simple.
The 25% variation in the under bonnet pressure would not translate to a 25% air flow change through the rad.
Temperature measurements in conjunction with the pressure measurements would give a better picture of what is happening.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on October 26, 2009, 03:53:10 PM
Ok - temps wise there is s*d all difference with the tray and without it on a moving car.  

The only bit left to decide on is whether the stability is effected at high speed, which is a little more difficult to test!:3Confused
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: batman on October 26, 2009, 04:31:49 PM
i have a v mount without and under tray and have had many a high speed run 150 160 mph and no issiues with stability
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: rx jamie on October 26, 2009, 08:20:03 PM
the undertray acts as a kind of venturi which helps remove hot air from the engine bay. id doubt that a clipped/screwed on piece of plastic sheet could massively effect stability at speed a huge amount as the engine sub frame and sump take up a lot of space which would keep the air flow smooth enough. might be a different story if the sheet was made of strong aluminium and was incorprorated into making the entire bottom of the car as flat/smooth as possible. id guess that would make a lot of downforce. but im no aerodynamics professor.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: CharlieP on October 26, 2009, 08:27:34 PM
I havent got round to making my undertray fit back on after my v-mount set-up, temps have been 20-40air and 82-85 water...so no drastic (if any affect so far)
 
But, I will be making the undertray fit again....as I don\'t really want to risk high speed instability...do you??
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: ashc on October 26, 2009, 08:40:02 PM
i\'ve not noticed any instability either over several track days
the way some vmounts are done (like mine) the rad fans would be totally obstruced by an undertray, my rad is only about ten degrees slant from the floor- i don\'t think i\'ll be putting it on again, no probs with temps either. The mot common style vmounts with the intercooler mounted 90 degrees to the floor and the rad at about 45 degrees would probably benefit though i suppose.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on October 28, 2009, 06:23:21 PM
OK - have you had any issues with gravel traps on track days...:Thumbsup!
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: ashc on October 28, 2009, 06:49:46 PM
most of my track experience has been at nurburg, no gravel traps there lol
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: davyv on October 28, 2009, 08:53:05 PM
A stone took out my aircon rad and radiator when i had no undertray when my car was stock.
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: suba on October 29, 2009, 10:25:55 PM
just trees and other stuff to hit then!:Thumbs-up
Title: Running without an undertray
Post by: overboost on November 02, 2009, 12:26:08 PM
I have a V-mount set up with no undertray. Both temps are decent. As for high speed stability can\'t really comment as I have a RE style diffuser and it plants the car to the ground on motorways.
 
I guess for those people changing their front bumper the undertray will have to go anyway. My plan is to get a feed front bumper and get one custom made to match it.