Print Page - non sequential

Title: non sequential
Post by: tyson23 on February 28, 2008, 06:45:28 PM

hi
just converted to the non sequential via the poor mans process so can undo
took out for blast and found it was pants the turbo\'s seem to cut in around 4000-4500 is the norm coz when mine was sequential it seems to cut in at lower revs and pull better...me thinks i will be changing back in the morning....

any ideas if this is how it is or is there something wrong

Title: non sequential
Post by: Bulla on February 28, 2008, 06:57:03 PM

Have you told the Apexi what it needs to know ?

Bulla

Title: non sequential
Post by: tyson23 on February 28, 2008, 07:18:14 PM

i have a power fc havent done anything to mapping

Title: non sequential
Post by: Martiny on February 28, 2008, 09:28:46 PM

Well, I am not sure what you were trying to achieve by going non-sequential? Mazda made it sequential so that the power would be available at low and high revs.

Title: non sequential
Post by: tyson23 on February 28, 2008, 09:32:02 PM

spose i was just curious to see what its like and all the talk about it

Title: non sequential
Post by: dthebuk on February 28, 2008, 10:35:28 PM

is the boost the same high up, but with no boost in the lower revs?
havn\'t really look into this but im quite intrigued

Title: non sequential
Post by: Martiny on February 29, 2008, 07:29:20 AM

The boost is the same up high. The benefit of this mod is to eleminate the slight dip in the boost as you pass through 4.5 k. However, you lose a lot of the low down boost.

Title: non sequential
Post by: S3TH on February 29, 2008, 11:12:07 AM

So it\'s like a laggy, very small turbo on stock boost? Oh I see all the benefits now... :rollin

Title: non sequential
Post by: Martiny on February 29, 2008, 03:44:58 PM

Quote from: S3THSo it\'s like a laggy, very small turbo on stock boost? Oh I see all the benefits now... :rollin

thats EXACTLY what it becomes !:Thumbs-up

Title: non sequential
Post by: interloper393 on February 29, 2008, 05:10:40 PM

well mine starts boost at 3200rpm.. and its much better i think, its all about what u prefer bud... i get better fuel economy too lol

Title: non sequential
Post by: Martiny on February 29, 2008, 08:06:04 PM

The way it improves consumption is because you drive round a low revs most of the time. This conversion has reduced your low revs boost a lot.

I agree its personal choice.

Title: non sequential
Post by: interloper393 on February 29, 2008, 08:09:14 PM

i find it alot like the evo 5 i had, boost started around 3200 then kicks you in the nuts.. alot like the non-seq lol

Mazda Rotary Club

Cars by Model Type => 3rd generation RX-7's => Topic started by: tyson23 on February 28, 2008, 06:45:28 PM