Hi guys, currently looking at a 92 fd, which has had a rebuilt not too long ago, but the trubos have been converted to non sequential...
I have read most of the threads about the non-sequentials...
can anyone has has experienced both give some advice pls?
I cant help thinking why would Mazda make a twin turbo if single or NS was better!?!?
And can it be put back easily? As i like low end power :3gears-rh
Hi mate,
Alot of people and I am included in this go the non sequential route because of boost issues with the twins, the pipework/hose for the turbo\'s control is very complicated and running the twins non sequential is and easy fix.
Other people have it done for the driving experience, I preferred driving my car with them NS as the car was more predictable (you didnt have a second turbo kicking in half way round a bend.)
My advice would be to drive both mate, and see what you prefer.:3gears-rh
As for putting it back it depends how the setup was achieved for one.
(see poor mans non sequential, by username \'Rixio\', or I think Donato did it the proper way with the wastegate being ported)
And two why was it done, as if you intend to put it back to standard, then you may have the initial boosting problem to deal with.
HTH
So does the NS conversion just nock out the 1st turbo then so you get the hit of the second turbo?
Sorry if this is a dumb question, im still new!:2Confused
NS makes both Turbos kick in together. The standard Sequential system has the first turbo come online and then the second turbo come on aswell later in the rev range. The Sequential is better low down but the kick you get when the second one comes on isnt as big as 2 at once non-sequentially.
Bulla
Ah, ok cheers Bulla!